Josh Mandel Divorce: The Court Made An Error In Sealing The Candidate’s Record

On Tuesday, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the divorce records of a man running for the Senate in Ohio had been improperly sealed.

Ashland County Domestic Court Judge Ronald Forsthoefel was forced to unseal divorce papers for Josh and Ilana Mandel in April 2020 after he failed to grant the necessary legal approval for doing so.

Something About The Josh Mandel First!

Joshua Aaron Mandel was born in the United States on September 27th, 1977. He is a member of the far right. During the years 2011–2019, he served as Ohio’s 48th treasurer. In the years between 2007 and 2011, he represented Ohio’s 17th district as the party’s Republican representative. He ran as a Republican in 2012 for the Senate but was defeated by incumbent Democrat Sherrod Brown.

In 2016, Mandel said he would challenge Brown again in 2018, but he has since withdrawn from that plan. In 2022, he made a second run for the Senate, but novelist J.D. Vance defeated him for the nomination.

Mandel was born on September 27, 1977 to Jewish parents Rita (née Friedman) and Bruce Mandel in Cleveland, Ohio. They reared him in a traditional Jewish household. Mandel’s grandma Fernanda is Italian but spent World War II sheltered from the Nazis by Christian families in the United States.

Josh Mandel Divorce
Josh Mandel Divorce

Joe Mandel’s grandpa is Polish and survived the Holocaust. Rachel, who has already been mentioned, is one of Mandel’s siblings. The quarterback for the Beachwood High School football team was.

Mandel obtained his bachelor’s degree from Ohio State University. For two different terms, he served as president of Ohio State University’s undergraduate student body. After finishing his undergraduate studies at Ohio State in 2000, he went on to obtain his J.D. from Case Western Reserve University’s law school.

Josh Mandel’s Personal Life

Mandel married social worker Ilana Shafran in Jerusalem in August of 2008. In April 2020, Mandel and Shafran filed for divorce. d The county judge who ordered the records to be sealed.

Despite the divorce being finalized in June of 2020, details on the division of assets and child support for their three children were not made public until the following year. In August of 2020, Mandel began dating Rachel Wilson, an employee on his campaign team.

Why Josh Mandel Divorce?

CITY OF ROYALTY IN OHIO: On Tuesday, the Ohio Supreme Court reversed the decision of an Ashland County court that had previously ordered the divorce papers of former state Treasurer and U.S. Senate candidate Josh Mandel and his ex-wife Ilana to remain sealed.

In an unsigned opinion, the state’s highest court ordered Ashland County Common Pleas Court Judge Ronald Forsthoefel to determine which divorce records are open to the general public.

In May, after placing second in the Republican primary for the Senate in 2022, Mandel released redacted copies of the divorce records showing that he received more than $1 million in the assets split during the divorce, the majority of which was in investment accounts, his state pension, and the equity in his new home in Beachwood.

Primary custody of their three children will be shared between Mandel and his ex-wife, Ilana, although he will be responsible for providing child support and health insurance. In April 2020, Forsthoefel granted the Mandels’ request to seal the divorce documents, despite the fact that neither party had provided any explanation for his decision and no specific legal precedent had been cited in support of sealing.

The Cincinnati Enquirer sued to get Forsthoefel’s ruling overturned so that the public might gain access to the records. In his defence, Forsthoefel points out that Mandel released censored versions of the documents to the media in February 2021, arguing that the lawsuit against the Enquirer is therefore groundless.

Josh Mandel Divorce
Josh Mandel Divorce

The Supreme Court, however, determined that the Enquirer wasn’t looking for access to information so much as it was seeking an order compelling Forsthoefel to reverse his sealing decision and another order prohibiting the court from carrying out the order. The Supreme Court further noted that the Enquirer’s claim only applies to the unredacted versions of the information, not the redacted versions.

The Supreme Court ruled that the lower court judge “failed to disclose whether he  considered a less restrictive means of limiting public access, such as redaction,” and “failed to explain why he thought the wholesale sealing of 21 case documents was the only legally proper way of resolving the Mandels’ motion.”

Two Republican justices, Pat DeWine and Sharon Kennedy joined the majority judgment in reaching this result, though Kennedy did write a separate opposing opinion.

Leave a Comment