Biden Administration Insists TikTok's Chinese Owners Split Off Their Part or Face Us Ban
Biden Administration Insists TikTok's Chinese Owners Split Off Their Part or Face Us Ban

Biden Administration Insists TikTok’s Chinese Owners Split Off Their Part or Face Us Ban

TikTok announced Wednesday night that the Biden administration has threatened to ban the app from the United States unless the business’s Chinese owners consent to sell off their portion of the social media network.

The apparent ultimatum issued by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a US multiagency panel, could be a turning point in the protracted negotiations between government representatives worried about TikTok’s ties to China and a hugely popular social media company with more than 100 million US users.

The Wall Street Journal broke the news of the recent divestiture request on Wednesday; TikTok later told CNN that CFIUS had contacted the company and that it did not dispute the Journal’s claim. However, TikTok refused to go into detail about the request’s contents, including when it was made, by the US government.

Divestment “doesn’t fix the problem if defending national security is the objective,” according to a statement from Maureen Shanahan, a representative for TikTok. “Data flows and access would not be subject to any new limitations as a result of a change in ownership.

You’ll be able to read more of our most recent news, such as this:

The transparent, US-based protection of US user data and systems, along with effective third-party monitoring, screening, and verification, are the greatest ways to address concerns about national security and are already something we are doing.

For more than two years, TikTok has been attempting to come to an agreement with CFIUS, a group made up of the Departments of Treasury, Justice, Homeland Security, Defense, and Commerce, among others, that would allow the app to continue to be sold in the US market despite security and privacy concerns.

US government officials have expressed concern that the Chinese government may use its national security laws to pressure TikTok or its Chinese parent company ByteDance into disclosing the personal information of TikTok’s US users, which could then be used for Chinese influence operations or intelligence gathering.

CFIUS’s chair, the Treasury Department, declined to comment. Some US senators who have worked to pass legislation banning the app have criticized the Biden administration as a result of the protracted and fruitless negotiations with TikTok.

Late last year, Congress approved legislation prohibiting TikTok from being used on US government computers, and President Joe Biden signed it, following the lead of various state governments. Since that time, the European Union and Canada have adopted a similar policy, showing a growing mistrust of TikTok among western governments.

But, there hasn’t been any proof to date that the Chinese government has gained access to user data on TikTok, and no nation has issued a more comprehensive ban that specifically targets TikTok on personal devices. With voluntary technological and administrative precautions that it claims will assist ensure American user data may only be accessible by US personnel, TikTok has tried to allay the fears of politicians.

You’ll be able to read more of our most recent news, such as this:

Personal data storage with Oracle, a major US cloud provider, is a component of that project, which the firm refers to as Project Texas. This month, TikTok introduced Project Clover, a similar campaign, across Europe. It hasn’t deterred TikTok’s detractors in the US. In addition to the limits aimed at US government devices, some US senators have attempted to enhance Biden’s ability to impose a nationwide ban on TikTok.

The plan was promptly embraced by the White House. Next week, when TikTok CEO Shou Chew is anticipated to face a grilling before the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the fire is likely to increase. According to Harry Broadman, a former CFIUS official, Wednesday’s announcement signals a shift has taken place in the traditionally secretive CFIUS discussions, albeit the precise nature of the movement is still unknown.

The call for divestiture may be the end of the conversation, but it’s equally likely that the divestiture is part of what CFIUS wants to protect national security, according to Broadman. “It’s really difficult to tell where the discussions are at CFIUS unless I’m in the room, and frankly, what’s spoken publicly does not always correspond with what’s happening at the table.”

About Jasley Marry 1255 Articles
Jasley Marry grew up in Durham, North Carolina, where she spent twelve ascetic years as a vegetarian before discovering spicy chicken wings are, in fact, a delicacy. She’s been a state-finalist competitive pianist, a hitchhiker, a pizza connoisseur, an EMT, an ex-pat in China and Sweden, and a science doctoral student. She’s also a bit of a snob about fancy whiskey. Jasley writes early in the morning, then spends the rest of the day trying to impress her Border collie puppy and make her experiments work.